Cloud-routed SaaS DLP

HoundShield vs Polymer

Polymer is a well-priced, transparent SaaS DLP with good SMB UX. But it's cloud-routed general DLP — it isn't built to keep CUI on-prem, and it doesn't produce a CMMC-mapped assessment artifact.

Side by side

DimensionHoundShieldPolymer
Where data is scannedLocally (Mode B/C)Polymer's cloud
Pricing transparency$499 report + published plansTransparent, low per-user
CMMC / NIST 800-171 evidence PDFYesNo
Air-gapped deploymentYes (Mode C)No
General SaaS DLP breadthAI-prompt focusedBroad SaaS DLP
Regulated-industry fitCMMC/HIPAA-firstGeneral-purpose

Comparison based on publicly available information, last reviewed 2026-07-04. Competitor facts change — tell us if anything here is out of date.

How Polymer works

Polymer provides low-cost, transparently priced SaaS DLP with a self-serve model, focused on scanning data in cloud SaaS apps and some AI surfaces. Inspection runs in Polymer's cloud.

Where Polymer is strong

  • Transparent, low per-user pricing — easy to buy
  • Clean self-serve SMB onboarding
  • Good general SaaS DLP coverage
  • Fast time-to-value for non-regulated teams

Where HoundShield pulls ahead

Local scanning for regulated data

HoundShield Mode B keeps prompt content on-prem. Polymer inspects in its cloud — fine for general data, not for CUI/PHI that can't leave the boundary.

CMMC assessment PDF, not just DLP

HoundShield ships a $499 NIST 800-171-mapped report. Polymer is DLP tooling, not a compliance-evidence deliverable.

Air-gapped and defense-ready

Mode C runs offline for IL-5+ networks — beyond a cloud SaaS DLP's reach.

Purpose-built for AI prompt interception

16 detection engines tuned for CUI/PHI/ITAR/CAGE/clearance markers in prompts, plus a SHA-256 hash-chained audit trail.

Who this matters most for: Healthcare (Rachel) and legal (Marcus) teams that liked Polymer's price but need regulated-data guarantees and an evidence artifact.

Choose Polymer when

  • You want inexpensive, transparent general SaaS DLP and your data isn't regulated CUI/PHI
  • You prefer a fully self-serve, cloud-only model

Choose HoundShield when

  • You handle CUI/PHI and need local, in-boundary scanning
  • You need a CMMC/NIST 800-171 evidence PDF
  • You need an air-gapped option

Handling CUI? Run Mode B.

HoundShield scans prompts locally in under 10ms. That CUI-safe property holds only when the scanner runs inside your own boundary. Pick the deployment mode that matches your data:

A · Hosted trial

On Vercel — not FedRAMP-authorized. Demo and non-CUI evaluation only.

B · Self-hosted Docker

Your own infrastructure. CUI-safe — prompt content never leaves your boundary. Right for CUI-handling contractors.

C · Air-gapped

Isolated network. CUI-safe. For enterprise / IL-5+ environments.

HoundShield vs Polymer

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Talk to a compliance engineer — we respond within 4 business hours.

Prove it on your own traffic

Run HoundShield locally for 14 days and get a $499 CMMC AI Risk Assessment PDF — no prompt content ever leaves your network.